> Who gets to define whats controversial? I didn't make it very clear, that was exactly my point. Any view will be controversial to _someone_ regardless of the

> Who gets to define whats controversial? I didn't make it very clear, that was exactly my point. Any view will be controversial to _someone_ regardless of the view. Which is why I posit that it is impossible to have a community leader posses non-controversial views. Unless of course the community is an echo-chamber, rejecting all who do not assimilate.