I'm not actually sure what you're getting at. I have two theories: a) You are implying that this article is an exception to the rule, b) This article is an ex

I'm not actually sure what you're getting at. I have two theories: a) You are implying that this article is an exception to the rule, b) This article is an example of the rule insofar as you can believe anything at all insofar as "practical" conformity is enforced regardless?