4 ms·
It may be useful for historical reconstruction, but this process will never be able to account for the possibilities covered by a real camera. For example, I us
by mod50ack 9y ago
It may be useful for historical reconstruction, but this process will never be able to account for the possibilities covered by a real camera. For example, I use cameras to take pictures at sporting events. Google isn't going to be able to predict exactly how the baseball players swing the bats. At best, they will produce a probably image which likely will deviate from reality. Ultimately, I see this tool as useful for historians but no good reason for us normal people to use it on a day to day basis.
- natch 9y agoI agree. Maybe we're taking the article too seriously though. There is no tool. It's just a really bad article. My guess is it was written by an excited very inexperienced person or someone who wanted to make clickbait.