3 ms·

No. That's why he was shot with non-lethal rounds. He suffered serious injuries certainly, and the whole case is deplorable, but it was a fairly reasonable resp

by rkangel 10y ago

No. That's why he was shot with non-lethal rounds. He suffered serious injuries certainly, and the whole case is deplorable, but it was a fairly reasonable response to his actions at that moment.

caf 10y ago
They're not "non-lethal", they're "less lethal". People can and do die from rubber bullets.
GordonS 10y ago
> That's why he was shot with non-lethal rounds In the face - not his legs or torso (Not that he should have been shot at all).