5 ms·
In that case, I'd say it qualifies as arguing over semantics since "CEO does X" is an oft-used stand-in for "CEO leads company to do X."
by houseabsolute 16y ago
In that case, I'd say it qualifies as arguing over semantics since "CEO does X" is an oft-used stand-in for "CEO leads company to do X."
- ojbyrne 16y agoSemantics perhaps, but the phrasing was particularly off-putting in this article. I know it was the first thing I noticed. I don't think I'd want to work for Chris Dixon.
- houseabsolute 16y agoI am impressed by your making that determination from a single article. That kind of decisiveness can be useful. Or maybe you have other data.
- ojbyrne 16y agoHis posts appear regularly here, and I was being polite.