3 ms·
Well I've already said that I think it's naive to think there could be an absolute morality, and I've also given you a specific example of a situation where I s
by brokenmachine 10y ago
Well I've already said that I think it's naive to think there could be an absolute morality, and I've also given you a specific example of a situation where I suspect your moral system probably falls down.
You've just declined to offer any explanation of what your system would propose in that situation.
So I guess the aspect of your claim that I doubt is the mere existence of your self-consistent and absolute moral system at all?
- akvadrako 10y agoOkay, there are 2 parts: 1. The consistency: it's just one rule, so it should be able to drive decisions without much ambiguity. 2. The "absoluteness": if it's unique as the only workable self-consistent moral system, that should suffice. Perhaps there are others, though I suspect they have one of these features: a. they drive equivalent decisions FAPP b. they are unstable and eventually won't be able to continue; either the hosts die or move onto another system I admit I haven't proven this to be the case, but I suspect it's true, or at least something along these lines. Certainly the opposite hasn't been proven.
- brokenmachine 10y ago>1. The consistency: it's just one rule ...Which is?