2 ms·
Well, considering how it would be implemented, I doubt "any app designed to help people use their phones less is unacceptable for distribution in the App Store"
by moron4hire 10y ago
Well, considering how it would be implemented, I doubt "any app designed to help people use their phones less is unacceptable for distribution in the App Store" was the real reason. It sounds more like, "any app indistinguishable from a virus has no place in any app store, anywhere."
>> Google, conversely, has welcomed Space to its mobile marketplace, the Google Play store, Brown says. This is a signal that the search giant is ready to "give people a little more control about how they want their minds to work," he says.
No, it's a signal that Google doesn't care enough about what goes in their app store to review entries before publishing them.
Honestly, I don't care what sort of apps you make. People really should have a choice about what apps they can install. App stores create a barrier to entry for app developers that stifle creativity and expression.
But I also think it's important to tell the truth about why things are happening. This article is a PR campaign. Who even heard of Space before this?
- Lazare 10y ago>I doubt "any app designed to help people use their phones less is unacceptable for distribution in the App Store" was the real reason. It sounds more like, "any app indistinguishable from a virus has no place in any app store, anywhere." I don't disagree that the latter sounds like a more sensible reason to reject the app, but the former is apparently a direct quote from the Apple rep.
- zepto 10y agoGiven that the rest of the explanation is dishonest, there is no reason to believe that this quote is not also a lie.
- moron4hire 10y agoI just assumed "A rep from the Apple Store Review reportedly said" meant "a rep from Space told us".