3 ms·
They could both be citing different primary sources, did you ever stop to consider that? Or were you busy stuffing that strawman? Let me know when you've checke
by bebopfunk 9y ago
They could both be citing different primary sources, did you ever stop to consider that? Or were you busy stuffing that strawman? Let me know when you've checked the primary source on both. Then I'll listen to your pedanticism. Until then you're being just as speculative as I am. Except, I at least cited a source and provided a disclaimer for the information I posted.
- erikb 9y agoA) Yeah, they could have, true. I also could become a billionaire tomorrow at 10:31 am. But the probability is so close towards 0% that it's much smarter to not assume it. B) Strawmans are awesome. Don't dare to criticise my strawman. I'm an artist! C) Yes, adding more reading material is always nice, and none of my comments was supposed to discredit that. Thanks for adding it. D) Still, don't increase your hopes because you've read another secondary source.