4 ms·
I'm pretty sure this guy solved (part of) it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cRlqE3D3RQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cRlqE3D3RQ if you want to skip the
by anotheryou 10y ago
I'm pretty sure this guy solved (part of) it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cRlqE3D3RQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cRlqE3D3RQ
if you want to skip the basics jump right in to part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nHbImkFKE4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nHbImkFKE4
He kinda takes off where Stephen Bax left it, but also uncovers some methodical errors of Bax.
I'd be very interested in what someone who knows a bit more about this than me thinks of this.
edit: short version in his update: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhtZc-nFNt0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhtZc-nFNt0