3 ms·
The r/videos subreddit has a rule against videos of fights/assault so whoever posted the video you linked to wasn't following directions. Every subreddit has it
by gdulli 10y ago
The r/videos subreddit has a rule against videos of fights/assault so whoever posted the video you linked to wasn't following directions. Every subreddit has its own rules. The front page of that subreddit is currently dominated by anti-United sentiment that doesn't violate the rules so I don't know what you're trying to imply.
Do people even make a cursory effort to verify these accusations before repeating them?
- noam87 10y ago> The r/videos subreddit has a rule against videos of fights/assault. Specifically against videos of police brutality / misconduct... which coincidentally came into effect around the time a police officer joined as moderator.
- gdulli 10y agoThere's a rule that isn't about police at all. > 9. No Videos of Assault/Battery > No videos of real-life, malicious person-on-person assault/battery or physical abuse of animals. This includes raw videos of fights and malicious violence.
- sdm 10y agoYet they rarely remove videos for physical abuse of animals.
- hammock 10y agoThe man is not shown to be resisting (not a fight), and it doesn't seem like police misconduct (or assault). Or am I mistaken? No need to be smug, especially when you're probably wrong. This all aside from the fact that I merely pointed out they were deleted, without judgment why. You should also be aware that there is almost always a "rule" in place to point to and serve as cover for tyrannical actions...Doesn't mean much in those cases. (Private company, blah blah, yeah we know. The point is many rules simply serve as cover for authorities to do whatever they want)