3 ms·

You reverse the questions. Why? The man didn't do anything, he just sat there. Those who did do something where those who injured him. Who was bleeding, the po

You reverse the questions. Why? The man didn't do anything, he just sat there. Those who did do something where those who injured him. Who was bleeding, the police, a United airlines person - or the passenger? But it is interesting that you still try to reframe the problem, anything to twist the issue. Do you work for United? I'm not accusing you, just asking, there certainly are more than enough people who are even more obedient to authority than at any time in the Kaiserreich (19th century Germany) whose only way to read any such story is "how can I possibly read this situation so that the big guys are right". Your idea of law and order seems to be top => down, and one-way only, the top guys command, the bottom guys obey - immediately, no questions (again: the passenger did not do anything, reacting to aggression is not aggression!).

benji-york 9y ago
> You reverse the questions. Why? I didn't intend on reversing a question. The only questions I see in this thread are ones I asked. I initially approached the situation from the perspective of the passenger, his decisions, and what would be right or wrong actions for him to take. Thinking about the same questions for the other actors in this situation — as you suggest — is also a good idea. > Do you work for United? Nope. > Your idea of law and order is top down - and one-way. If you knew me, you might reconsider that evaluation.
- IIIIIIIIIIII 9y ago
  > I didn't intend on reversing a question. I didn't talk about "intent" but about what you did. > Nope. Ahh, somebody likes selective quoting. Care to read the entire section next time? > If you knew me, you might reconsider that evaluation. I know what you wrote and that's what I responded to. I don't care what you do with the rest of your life, I don't see it so there is nothing to comment. I commented on the visible part.

benji-york 9y ago

> You reverse the questions. Why? I didn't intend on reversing a question. The only questions I see in this thread are ones I asked. I initially approached the situation from the perspective of the passenger, his decisions, and what would be right or wrong actions for him to take. Thinking about the same questions for the other actors in this situation — as you suggest — is also a good idea. > Do you work for United? Nope. > Your idea of law and order is top down - and one-way. If you knew me, you might reconsider that evaluation.

IIIIIIIIIIII 9y ago
> I didn't intend on reversing a question. I didn't talk about "intent" but about what you did. > Nope. Ahh, somebody likes selective quoting. Care to read the entire section next time? > If you knew me, you might reconsider that evaluation. I know what you wrote and that's what I responded to. I don't care what you do with the rest of your life, I don't see it so there is nothing to comment. I commented on the visible part.