3 ms·
Your Python example doesn't really support your argument. Python succeeded for data analysis and scientific computing in part because it provided easy access to
by stedalus 9y ago
Your Python example doesn't really support your argument. Python succeeded for data analysis and scientific computing in part because it provided easy access to existing numerical libraries written in C and Fortran. So you got the best of both worlds: ease of use and near-native speed. It would not have succeeded if everything was done in interpreted Python.
- lerpa 9y ago> ease of use and near-native speed And still when we want actual speed we port it to C++ or at least need to use Cython.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]