5 ms·
I agree. Still running a Phenom XII 940. Of course I've been upgrading the HDD all along (went through a Raptor, a VelociRaptor, an early 80GB SSD and finally a
by neogodless 10y ago
I agree. Still running a Phenom XII 940. Of course I've been upgrading the HDD all along (went through a Raptor, a VelociRaptor, an early 80GB SSD and finally a 256GB Samsung), and put in a new video card about four years ago (don't play latest games, anyway.)
The Phenom cost me... $220. So the Ryzen 5 1600 has my name written all over it. But really, it would just make some things I do on my computer a little quicker. It would not have the profound effect that switching to an SSD did, in my opinion. I'll let the idea bake for a while.
- Insanity 10y agoYeah I upgraded other parts of my machine as well - just did not feel the need to touch the CPU. And actually, I had 8GB of RAM when it started out and I did not change that either. 8GB still runs fine for me. I should switch to a 256GB SSD as well though, that is on my list of things I want to upgrade.
- dbancajas 10y agoYou mean Phenom II right? I have Phenom II X4 925 from 6 years ago. On the same boat. To think that I worked on Ryzen performance while it was being developed/brought up. I'm a bit emotional but still not pulling the trigger.
- neogodless 10y agoYes, Phenom II X4 940. (I called it a Phenom II 940 in my previous post.)
- dlevine 10y agoI'm running a Phenom II 1055T (x6). It actually seems to be ok for pretty much everything, including gaming at 1440p (I've upgraded the GPU 3 times and am currently running a GTX 1070, 16GB of RAM, and an SSD). Not bad for a system that's almost 7 years old. The only issue is that I tried using the Oculus, and it won't work. Apparently the CPU doesn't have some instructions required for VR. I tried using a hacked version of the Oculus setup program that bypasses the CPU check, but it still won't work. Which is why I've been thinking about a Ryzen 5...
- throwawayish 10y agoI had a similar chip since 2011 and only recently upgraded. For thread-heavy workloads even one of the fastest E3 Xeons is only like 40-50 % faster (if no special insns like AES can be used). Safe to say it had superb price/performance (IIRC paid like 150 € for it).
- simonsquiff 10y agoI'm the same - Phenom II, upgraded to SSD and new graphics but that's it. When you say this has your name written on it, are they socket compatible? The idea of changing motherboards/ memory etc isn't compelling - I'd just get a new system - but if you can drop these in then it's really tempting.
- sp332 10y agoNope, Phenom II could work in an AM3 or AM3+ socket (depending on whether your particular model supported DDR3 RAM) but AM4 doesn't physically fit. Plus the new CPUs don't have DDR3 controllers so they couldn't use your RAM anyway.
- neogodless 10y agoNope, I mean, spending the same amount as I did 8 years ago, and getting 8 years out of this new CPU sounds appealing to me! But I've got a uATX case, so my motherboard selection is mildly limited. I don't mind swapping out a motherboard. I used to do it rather frequently, for myself and for others. I believe the socket I have now is AM2+, which is not at all compatible with AM4. I'd also need new RAM. Overall, I'd expect to spend close to $400.
- einr 10y agoI'm running a Phenom II X4 965 and I have yet to feel limited by CPU speed. Really snappy for everything I do. This is a 2009 CPU. To put that in perspective, that is like using a 486 DX4/100 in 2002, when the state of the art was Pentium 4's at 3 GHz. Pretty amazing, actually.
- rubber_duck 10y ago>To put that in perspective, that is like using a 486 DX4/100 in 2002, when the state of the art was Pentium 4's at 3 GHz. Pretty amazing, actually. Stagnation in improvements is amazing ? :\