3 ms·

How many sockets has AMD had in "just the last couple years"? Right, the AM3 socket started being sold February 2009, and AM3+ was entirely compatible with tha

How many sockets has AMD had in "just the last couple years"? Right, the AM3 socket started being sold February 2009, and AM3+ was entirely compatible with that. [edit] Also: FM2, targeting a different range of performance, came out in 2012. Again, FM2+ was backwards compatible there too. Still five years since a non-backwards-compatible AMD chipset. You might be thinking about Intel's practices.

onli 10y ago
To be fair, after AM3 there was also FM1, FM2, FM2+, AM1 and AM2.
- striking 10y ago
  AM1/2 are older than AM3. And you're right that FM1/2/2+ exist, but FM2 came out in 2012 and FM2+ was backwards compatible with FM2 CPUs. FM chipsets targeted a different range of performance, so I consider the updates to those chipsets orthogonal to the AM series. Thanks for pointing out the FM series, though; I've modified my comment to reflect this.
  - onli 10y ago
    Made a mistake there, you are right, partly. The AM2 is indeed the older AM3, I meant only the AM1, which was a recent platform for some processors with a low TDP. Not very known, it is no surprise it wasn't on your radar.
    - dragontamer 10y ago
      AM1 was a competitor to Intel's Atom chips. Which have no socket at all! AM1 was very niche, but a socket for ~20W CPUs is outstanding. You can pair any AM1 motherboard (down to $20 crap) with any AM1 CPU ($20 crap to $100 less crap). Good for HTPCs and NAS machines... when you need a "serious" Raspberry Pi ish machine with x86 compatibility, AM1 was my choice.
      - onli 10y ago
        I agree. Those were nice cpus and it is not a bad thing that they had a socket. I did not list them as a negative point, but to show that AMD had more sockets in the last time than AM3+, which could maybe partly explain OPs misconception that AMD spread their cpus over them more than Intel. When FM2+ got upgrades while AM3+ got them as well, it was indeed a strange split. That is was nothing compared what Intel does with their platform segmentation seems to have got lost.

onli 10y ago

To be fair, after AM3 there was also FM1, FM2, FM2+, AM1 and AM2.

striking 10y ago
AM1/2 are older than AM3. And you're right that FM1/2/2+ exist, but FM2 came out in 2012 and FM2+ was backwards compatible with FM2 CPUs. FM chipsets targeted a different range of performance, so I consider the updates to those chipsets orthogonal to the AM series. Thanks for pointing out the FM series, though; I've modified my comment to reflect this.
- onli 10y ago
  Made a mistake there, you are right, partly. The AM2 is indeed the older AM3, I meant only the AM1, which was a recent platform for some processors with a low TDP. Not very known, it is no surprise it wasn't on your radar.
  - dragontamer 10y ago
    AM1 was a competitor to Intel's Atom chips. Which have no socket at all! AM1 was very niche, but a socket for ~20W CPUs is outstanding. You can pair any AM1 motherboard (down to $20 crap) with any AM1 CPU ($20 crap to $100 less crap). Good for HTPCs and NAS machines... when you need a "serious" Raspberry Pi ish machine with x86 compatibility, AM1 was my choice.
    - onli 10y ago
      I agree. Those were nice cpus and it is not a bad thing that they had a socket. I did not list them as a negative point, but to show that AMD had more sockets in the last time than AM3+, which could maybe partly explain OPs misconception that AMD spread their cpus over them more than Intel. When FM2+ got upgrades while AM3+ got them as well, it was indeed a strange split. That is was nothing compared what Intel does with their platform segmentation seems to have got lost.