3 ms·
No, he's right. It's perception. If you have an ugly bottle it doesn't matter if your wine is good, because most people won't get to try it.
by nkkollaw 10y ago
No, he's right.
It's perception.
If you have an ugly bottle it doesn't matter if your wine is good, because most people won't get to try it.
- jacquesm 10y agoThe very best wines and the $2.95 stuff are in essentially the same bottle.
- nkkollaw 10y agoNope. This is (one of?) the cheapest wine in Italy: http://www.horecare.it/imagesvinobrik/full013.jpg http://www.horecare.it/imagesvinobrik/full013.jpg This is a really good Italian wine: http://www.terredifirenze.it/sites/default/files/bottiglia%20fortuni.jpg http://www.terredifirenze.it/sites/default/files/bottiglia%2...
- jacquesm 10y agohttp://www.wine-searcher.com/ http://www.wine-searcher.com/ Try to be serious. Wine that costs 1000's of $ per bottle is in exactly the same bottle as wine that costs next to nothing. The only difference is the label. Of course there are marketing whizzes that package crap wine in fancy bottles to sell it at inflated rates but that's nothing to do with what I was trying to illustrate. Winebottle: glass enclosure usually topped off with a cork, usually made of green glass. That there is wine that is so cheap it isn't even sold in bottles is an optimization, the fact that there are very fancy bottles with wine that usually isn't all that good is marketing.
- nkkollaw 10y agoWhatever you say.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]