> But today, it seems that time, length, and mass are all quantized. There's thus not a physical basis for the existence of reals. This is actually not the cas

> But today, it seems that time, length, and mass are all quantized. There's thus not a physical basis for the existence of reals. This is actually not the case. Space and time are not regarded as quantized by the majority of physicists and there's also absolutely no evidence suggesting that. To the contrary, such quantization would lead to inconsistencies – e.g. with relativity – pretty quickly. Fur further reading: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/9076/does-quantum-mechanics-assume-space-and-time-are-continuous https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/9076/does-quantu... https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/67899/is-time-quantized-is-there-a-fundamental-time-unit-that-cannot-be-divided https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/67899/is-time-qu...