3 ms·
I understand they don't get legal protection. That's not my point. My point is that companies don't just dump out information on how they operate. They protect
by arkis22 10y ago
I understand they don't get legal protection. That's not my point. My point is that companies don't just dump out information on how they operate. They protect their trade secrets, which as the definition you provided says, are worthy of protection. Thanks.
- michaelmrose 10y agoI would argue that the consumers right to have access to a lot of that information is considered normal and is vastly more important that the companies need to protect it. Enough so that we ought to legally protect the consumer even at the expense of the company. After all there are more of us than them why shouldn't we protect ourselves?
- arkis22 10y agoThe law you cited seems to do that. Companies have no right to stop consumers from purchasing goods that use their trade secrets without their consent.