3 ms·
According to the comments I'm the only one who liked the article. I've had a lot of math but never any signal processing (i.e. FT) and never really got to wrap
by Rainymood 10y ago
According to the comments I'm the only one who liked the article. I've had a lot of math but never any signal processing (i.e. FT) and never really got to wrap my head around the concept of a FT. I realize that the person here is making a lot of simplifications but you've gotta start from somewhere. Great job on making an article that is both engaging but still "mathy".
Can't please everyone I guess ... especially not on HN.
- brian-armstrong 10y agoMy biggest complaint with it was honestly just the title. It's cool to hear about another person seeing the utility in FT. Now go stare at a graphic equalizer on your music player :D
- lutusp 10y agoThe article is all right. I would have liked to see somewhere a mention of the fact that the transform being described moves between the time and frequency domains, and that the relationship is reciprocal.