3 ms·
From 15 seconds down to 9 isn't "double" the performance. Impressive, yes. But then there's the disingenuous comparison of paying full price for 64MB from Apple
by CodeWriter23 10y ago
From 15 seconds down to 9 isn't "double" the performance. Impressive, yes. But then there's the disingenuous comparison of paying full price for 64MB from Apple that nobody in their right mind ever pays. This article is a complete arithmetic failure.
- chmod775 10y agoHe got 7.8s with an overclocked Ryzen, which is where the "double" came from. And honestly whether you pay for the most expensive model of the Mac or not (I'm assuming you meant 64GB of RAM, not 64MB), the point of the article stands. Because where's the point in arguing over whether something is a 6x worse choice, or just a 4x worse choice. Meh.
- CodeWriter23 9y agoAnd you're arithmetically challenged. 7.8s is not half of 14.9s.