3 ms·

Richard Stallman's Glossary

6 points by jordigh 10y ago

joaomacp 10y ago
1337 terms m8
deleted 10y ago
[deleted]
jcvernaleo 10y ago
If past hn links to stallman.org are any indication I expect to see complaints (probably legit ones even) about my html on that page within 5 minutes of this posting :)
- jordigh 10y ago
  Oh, you write his HTML? I thought he would write it himself. I know he reads HTML, as that's how I've seen him read webpages. I know he has volunteers to help install his polnotes. I didn't know others did the rest of the website for him.
  - jcvernaleo 10y ago
    He does do some html but generally he just provides things in plane text with maybe a little html markup in it.
- theandrewbailey 10y ago
  Since you asked, in Firefox, do a view source on this page. It will helpfully highlight errors in red. I see 4: No "--" in comments. (twice) Missing equals: <li id"faux"> Missing space: <ahref="/uber.html">
  - jcvernaleo 10y ago
    I wasn't aware that Firefox view src had that. Cool, thanks. I fixed those and fixed one more that was hidden by one of those typos.
- Nadya 10y ago
  Links should have a different colored :hover state (accessibility concerns) and there is a typo for the font-size of the `vol` class. Not sure if you're in charge of the CSS as well. :) .vol { margin-left: 5%; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size=2.5em; // = should be : }
  - jcvernaleo 10y ago
    I didn't write too much of the css, but I do still take care of it. Not idea how that = instead of : slipped in. Even I'm not normally that bad with css (and emacs syntax highlighting even makes it clear that what was there was wrong). So I fixed that bit. I agree about the :hover state for accessibility but since that touches the entire site (or at least should) and we already have some :hover stuff on the certain elements it requires a little thought/experimenting (more than I have time for this afternoon anyway).
notliketherest 10y ago
Richard Stallman is a senile old man.
- ivcha 10y ago
  He is not. And don't forget that he deserves much more respect, partly due to his contributions to the software practice, free software, and freedom in general.
chasing 10y ago
Is it 2007? Edit: Oh, nevermind. There are a couple dopey Trump digs towards the bottom.

6 points by jordigh 10y ago

joaomacp 10y ago

1337 terms m8

deleted 10y ago

[deleted]

jcvernaleo 10y ago

If past hn links to stallman.org are any indication I expect to see complaints (probably legit ones even) about my html on that page within 5 minutes of this posting :)

jordigh 10y ago
Oh, you write his HTML? I thought he would write it himself. I know he reads HTML, as that's how I've seen him read webpages. I know he has volunteers to help install his polnotes. I didn't know others did the rest of the website for him.
- jcvernaleo 10y ago
  He does do some html but generally he just provides things in plane text with maybe a little html markup in it.
theandrewbailey 10y ago
Since you asked, in Firefox, do a view source on this page. It will helpfully highlight errors in red. I see 4: No "--" in comments. (twice) Missing equals: <li id"faux"> Missing space: <ahref="/uber.html">
- jcvernaleo 10y ago
  I wasn't aware that Firefox view src had that. Cool, thanks. I fixed those and fixed one more that was hidden by one of those typos.
Nadya 10y ago
Links should have a different colored :hover state (accessibility concerns) and there is a typo for the font-size of the `vol` class. Not sure if you're in charge of the CSS as well. :) .vol { margin-left: 5%; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size=2.5em; // = should be : }
- jcvernaleo 10y ago
  I didn't write too much of the css, but I do still take care of it. Not idea how that = instead of : slipped in. Even I'm not normally that bad with css (and emacs syntax highlighting even makes it clear that what was there was wrong). So I fixed that bit. I agree about the :hover state for accessibility but since that touches the entire site (or at least should) and we already have some :hover stuff on the certain elements it requires a little thought/experimenting (more than I have time for this afternoon anyway).

notliketherest 10y ago

Richard Stallman is a senile old man.

ivcha 10y ago
He is not. And don't forget that he deserves much more respect, partly due to his contributions to the software practice, free software, and freedom in general.

chasing 10y ago

Is it 2007? Edit: Oh, nevermind. There are a couple dopey Trump digs towards the bottom.