3 ms·
But the morals of a society are not constant. They are a function of the morals of the individuals living in a society. What was perfectly acceptable in the 12t
by nzmsv 16y ago
But the morals of a society are not constant. They are a function of the morals of the individuals living in a society. What was perfectly acceptable in the 12th century is barbaric now. In a century or two we will seem barbarians to our descendants. (And they will still be saying that their generation lost all morals and humans will soon die out.)
- bruceboughton 16y agoI wonder for what reasons our society will be judged barbaric by our descendants.
- Shorel 16y agoIrak, the SUV vehicles, the bullying in schools, people parasiting the welfare system, the predatory banking practices, all those things seem barbaric to me.
- bruceboughton 16y agoIraq: seems short-sighted to me. We don't tend to judge past civilisations based on one war. SUVs: maybe, but I would say our continued reliance on oil in general rather than SUVs in particular. Bullying: could be. Parasites on the welfare system: not convinced. The fact we have a welfare system will be judged favourably I expect. Predatory banking practices: pass, not sure. It's hard to imagine what things it will be--their values may be very different from ours. I'd say oil reliance, over population, the gulf between the rich and the impoverished, but these things are all too obvious. I suspect we'd be surprised by what we're judged badly for.