3 ms·
I'm not worried: http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/reef-tourism-operators-find-less-than-five-per-cent-of-coral-dead-under-extreme-bleaching/news-st
by ericras 9y ago
I'm not worried: http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/reef-tourism-operators-find-less-than-five-per-cent-of-coral-dead-under-extreme-bleaching/news-story/79247a63aa8166da0920d6af6567e642 http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/reef-tourism-o...
>> “Scientists had written off that entire northern section as a complete white-out,’’ Mr Eade said. “We expected the worst. But it is tremendous condition, most of it is pristine, the rest is in full recovery."
>> “It wasn’t until we got underwater that we could get a true picture of what percentage of reef was bleached,’’ Mr Stephen said. “The discrepancy is phenomenal. It is so wrong. Everywhere we have been we have found healthy reefs."
Also: "Great Barrier Reef: scientists ‘exaggerated’ coral bleaching" http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/great-barrier-reef-scientists-exaggerated-coral-bleaching/news-story/99810c83f5a420727b12ab255256774b http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/great-barrier-re...
>> A full survey of the reef released yesterday by the authority and the Australian Institute of Marine Science said 75 per cent of the reef would escape unscathed.
>> Dr Reichelt said the vast bulk of bleaching damage was confined to the far northern section off Cape York, which had the best prospect of recovery due to the lack of onshore development and high water quality.
- fencepost 9y agoAny non-paywalled sources? The original article does note that "The Queensland tourism industry raised questions about the reliability of the survey, saying scientists had previously made exaggerated claims about mortality rates and bleaching."