3 ms·
I think what the article argues is exactly this: there would be less hyper-connected nodes if the nodes would be more locally connected. The spreading of the di
by lkozma 16y ago
I think what the article argues is exactly this: there would be less hyper-connected nodes if the nodes would be more locally connected. The spreading of the disease would happen much more slowly in this case. This fits in with the theory of scale-free networks.
links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small-world_networks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small-world_networks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degrees_of_separation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degrees_of_separation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watts_and_Strogatz_model http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watts_and_Strogatz_model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erd%C5%91s%E2%80%93R%C3%A9nyi_model http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erd%C5%91s%E2%80%93R%C3%A9nyi_m...
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- nkassis 16y agoI think I understand that now. Although, not sure that people who are very promiscuous would enjoy having more competition ;0) Thanks for the links, this article made me want to go back and look into this stuff more. Relevant to my current work also.
- lkozma 16y agoAlso, if you want a more readable and entertaining introduction, I highly recommend the book "Linked: The new science of networks" by Barabasi.