> They are so desperate to have it This is completely false. In fact, they're quite honest about the fact they don't mind if it doesn't. Here's an example: ht

> They are so desperate to have it This is completely false. In fact, they're quite honest about the fact they don't mind if it doesn't. Here's an example: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/617b7h/peter_rizun_the_future_will_look_similar_to_the/dfcdfc5/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/617b7h/peter_rizun... gmax says: "none of us are particular eager to see segwit activate-- we did our part, Bitcoin is just fine without it. -- bitcoin core doesn't even signal it by default, though I suppose the next version probably will." > They explicitly say that it could be decades before any more block size increases come around. Since nobody can predict the future by more than a few months, and most people know this, you should probably cite this. I'm pretty sure nobody has said that it will be decades before a hardfork. In fact, most people have been quite forthright in that a good hardfork is something they are looking forward to. lol