3 ms·
When I started Picnic CSS[1] there were few CSS libraries out there and the ones that were available were severely lacking. They didn't have either :hover or :a
by franciscop 10y ago
When I started Picnic CSS[1] there were few CSS libraries out there and the ones that were available were severely lacking. They didn't have either :hover or :active states, no transitions, etc.
Now with new libraries or modern versions of those, including Semantic UI, I wonder whether it's time to stop supporting it and switch to one of those. They are still different but with somewhat similar principles (at least compared to others) such as the grid: <div class="flex two"><div></div><div></div></div>.
What I want to say, kudos. As I see jlukic answering some questions, how do you find the time/sponsorship to keep working on it? Is it a personal project, company project, funded through some external medium, etc? I see there's a donate button, does people contribute there a lot?
[1] https://picnicss.com/ https://picnicss.com/
- dvnguyen 10y agoSad I am considering to use picnicss in my next project. What you would recommend besides Semantic UI?
- franciscop 10y agoI haven't really seen Picnic CSS in the wild (only here https://gyshido.com/ https://gyshido.com/ and in my own projects) so I actually have no idea on adoption, which is one of the main decision points. I will probably keep using Picnic for most of my projects. My two main alternatives are Materialize CSS for mobile because of the styles ( http://materializecss.com/ http://materializecss.com/ ) and Semantic UI for quick mock-ups/prototypes because of how complete it is (while looking way better than Bootstrap). Another "alternative" (not for CSS but for the type of projects I do) is https://html5up.net/ https://html5up.net/ since they are really well designed when personalization is not so important.
- allendoerfer 10y agoI used it, thanks for creating it!