I'm not really sure you replied to the right post, or you might be mixing up some things. The hackingdistributed article I was criticizing was framing Greg Max

I'm not really sure you replied to the right post, or you might be mixing up some things. The hackingdistributed article I was criticizing was framing Greg Maxwell as making up the whole ASICBOOST attack as pro-SegWit propaganda. There seems to be a group that's extremely anti-SegWit that thinks that the ASICBOOST news is made up to push SegWit through, and the article is following that pattern. I wouldn't necessarily call my criticisms "pro-SegWit", but it's definitely not on the mentioned anti-SegWit "side" if someone were to group things by side. >or some well funded group is spending a lot of money to support SegWit and push Core's agenda. The operator of Antpool has been one of the people speaking out against SegWit, and it's just been revealed that he most likely has had a huge secret monetary incentive against SegWit and not for the good of the network.