4 ms·
> - Segwit actualy block harmful form of ASICBOOST It's - of course - not the only solution to this "problem", but somehow this paper doesn't propose anything
by needs 9y ago
> - Segwit actualy block harmful form of ASICBOOST
It's - of course - not the only solution to this "problem", but somehow this paper doesn't propose anything else other than segwit, and his conclusion is a typical Bitcoin Core propaganda.
> by "growing majority" you mean handful of chinese miners and 2% of nodes (http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/softwar... http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/softwar...)
You aren't without knowing that in Bitcoin, miners establish consensus by voting with their hashrate. Nodes count doesn't prove anything because its really easy to host a node. The point is: there is more miners supporting BU than Segwit [1].
[1]: http://xtnodes.com/#bitcoin_classic_blocks http://xtnodes.com/#bitcoin_classic_blocks
- midmagico 9y ago> but somehow this paper doesn't propose anything else other than segwit Literally there's another solution that has nothing to do with Segwit. gmax himself proposed it to block off covert ASICBoost. Here's a link: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/013996.html https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017... Also, miners do not establish consensus. That is why if a miner mines an invalid block, even if other miners extend it, no nodes will accept it.