> not one interviewer reported noticing that he or she was conducting a random interview. More striking still, the students who conducted random interviews rate

> not one interviewer reported noticing that he or she was conducting a random interview. More striking still, the students who conducted random interviews rated the degree to which they “got to know” the interviewee slightly higher on average Yeah well, when you're asking questions of someone who looks thoughtful very briefly, then answers almost immediately after, it sounds like you might have more reason to think you know them better than the one actually considering their answer Might be introducing a confound or two that you then proceed to completely ignore and even conclude past lest someone accidentally draw other conclusions