3 ms·
That's a blatant GPL violation. "No additional restrictions"...
by milesrout 10y ago
That's a blatant GPL violation. "No additional restrictions"...
- detaro 10y agoIt is just a dual license, which for contributions to their repo is completely fine, as long as they have it for everything? You still can change and publish whatever you want in your forks, your rights under the AGPL are not infringed. Quite common pattern with AGPL-software provided by companies, although normally the business model is to sell an "Enterprise edition" or something.