3 ms·
In some cases the library affected may now instead provide a security risk in itself, which you wouldn't have had you only gone with plain HTTP. This cuts both
by caf 10y ago
In some cases the library affected may now instead provide a security risk in itself, which you wouldn't have had you only gone with plain HTTP.
This cuts both ways though - maybe your package parsing and signature verification code has a security flaw in it, in which case you'll find yourself wishing you had the protection of only trying to parse packages from the HTTPS-verified legitimate source.
So the answer to the question posed earlier, "...so what value does HTTPS provide in those cases?" is that it avoids have a single point of failure in your security architecture.
It's also worth pointing out that most of those protocol-level TLS vulnerabilities mentioned wouldn't have been exploitable in the far more restricted setting of "device that phones home to check for updates".