4 ms·
I'm not saying he/she was. But do consider that in one case the most cursory circumstantial evidence is enough to convict, but in this case the same level of "e
by throwaway71958 9y ago
I'm not saying he/she was. But do consider that in one case the most cursory circumstantial evidence is enough to convict, but in this case the same level of "evidence" is not enough to exonerate. Double standard, anyone?
- doktrin 9y ago> the same level of evidence Whatever's written in that blog post, and how it's written, is neither enough to convict nor exonerate.