Well, we are there again. This is the very common Berkley Gender Admission Bias all over again. DoL just forgot to check their base rates of female developers a

Well, we are there again. This is the very common Berkley Gender Admission Bias all over again. DoL just forgot to check their base rates of female developers and points to a relation nevertheless. I wouldn't be surprised if, when accounting for the distribution of female developers, it were to be the other way around. That Google is paying a bit more to retain them.