3 ms·
I mean the conclusion is already cryptically hidden in the headline. It's just a terrible style. How I, as a non-native writer, would've written it: Charging mo
by emsy 10y ago
I mean the conclusion is already cryptically hidden in the headline. It's just a terrible style. How I, as a non-native writer, would've written it:
Charging money for parking prevents traffic jams
Or something along those lines.
- ghaff 10y agoThe Economist likes to be clever with their headlines. It's definitely hard to parse but that was probably deliberate on the part of the editor.