Hells to the yes. To take things a step further, I'm not entirely sure how I'd function without them. (I'm sure I'd find a way, but it would be an adjustment

Hells to the yes. To take things a step further, I'm not entirely sure how I'd function without them. (I'm sure I'd find a way, but it would be an adjustment and a loss) Firefox's fuzzy searching in the URL bar makes bookmarks awesome. My "workflow": 1. Bookmark anything I might need later by clicking the bookmark button. It presents a little tooltip-like popup that lets me edit the title and tags if I want to. 2. Sometimes I edit the title/tags and sometimes I don't. I make this call based on a quick judgement call on whether the default will allow me to find the article later. Suppose the article title is "MySQL Adds Froitz-Based Blammo Filtering." Well, that should suffice. But if the title is merely "10 Awesome New MySQL Features" then I might want to edit the title/tags to mention something about "Froitz-Based Blammo Filtering" if that's what I'm interested in. [1] 3. Then I usually never use the bookmark ever again. 4. BUT, sometimes I do. And Firefox's fuzzy match implementation lets me type "mysql froitz" and get a match on this bookmark 100% of the time. Chrome's matching is stupider & I'm not sure about Safari. Safari makes adding bookmarks less convenient than FF or Chrome so I assume finding them is harder. (Maybe it's not, I don't know) I don't know about Firefox's bookmarking performance characteristics. But, I know that I've been adding lots of bookmarks forever and it "just works" and it feels instance. The fact that I've never had to think about it beyond that point is a compliment of the highest order. That's one of the many reasons why I remain a dedicated Firefox supporter. __________ [1] This is just a theoretical example, of course. MySQL does not actually receive new features, awesome or otherwise.