3 ms·
Yes, a smaller financial sector would make lending more expensive. But would that be a bad thing, socially speaking? A smaller financial sector would stabilise
by markvdb 10y ago
Yes, a smaller financial sector would make lending more expensive. But would that be a bad thing, socially speaking?
A smaller financial sector would stabilise the financial and economical system, albeit at a lower level of economic activity. The less rich and powerful suffer most from economic instability. They also stand to gain most from increased stability. Ask people from the Baltic states about what happened in 2008-2009...
Who is the biggest beneficiary of credit? Us, the rich and powerful!
Have a look at the most expensive thing most people ever buy in their lives: a house! Housing prices and interest rates are directly linked. More expensive lending would mean lower housing prices. To some extent, deflating that bubble is actually a good thing for the less rich and powerful!
- ori_b 10y ago> More expensive lending would mean lower housing prices. That benefits people who can pay in cash. Otherwise, the difference in price goes to the bank as interest.
- MR4D 10y agoMight also want to note that it negatively affects borrows. Especially those who are underwater on their home loan.
- MR4D 10y agoLook at history. The industry shrunk in the great depression and also in 2008. Do you really want to bring that on again? Also, the rich get richer in recessions relative to poorer people.