4 ms·
The US Dept. of Labor is suing Google for not revealing compensation data [0]. The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) has suspicion on pay
by denzil_correa 10y ago
The US Dept. of Labor is suing Google for not revealing compensation data [0].
The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) has suspicion on pay disparities and in order to investigate further sent a request to Google to access some records (Point 9) [1]. Google denied OFCCP access to these records. Now, DoL has taken Google to court to get access to the records they need to investigate further and complete their evaluation. I wonder why Google is being so evasive about it.
[0] https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/ofccp/ofccp20170104 https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/ofccp/ofccp20170104
[1] https://www.dol.gov/sites/default/files/newsroom/newsreleases/OFCCP20162406_0.pdf https://www.dol.gov/sites/default/files/newsroom/newsrelease...
- jimmywanger 10y ago> I wonder why Google is being so evasive about it. The article says that Google thinks the DOL is going on a fishing expedition. They turned over records, but like most private companies, don't like turning over records for no reason, especially about highly confidential information such as compensation packages.
- denzil_correa 10y ago> The article says that Google thinks the DOL is going on a fishing expedition. That's because the system is designed in such a way. The DoL can't make a case without access to meaningful data. So, if the system is designed to make access difficult this is what we end up with. > They turned over records They did not turn over records - that's what the entire lawsuit is about as mentioned in the court documents.
- matt_wulfeck 10y agoClearly they've turned over at least some records before. They're making their case with 2015 data.
- denzil_correa 10y agoI don't think so. The lawsuit clearly mentions that Google denied access to data. In fact, Google attorney is on record saying that we denied access too.
- matt_wulfeck 10y agoThen what is the 2015 data mentioned in the article?