It would be nice if you would cite your sources. (http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites-political-fact-checker-is-just-a-failed-libera

It would be nice if you would cite your sources. (http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites-political-fact-checker-is-just-a-failed-liberal-blogger/ http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websi...) Your quotes look like little more than personal attacks, and a glance through Lacapria's list of articles on Snopes reveals plenty of debunking from both sides of the isle. http://www.snopes.com/author/kim/ http://www.snopes.com/author/kim/ Further, the articles seem clearly written, well cited, and as factual as I would reasonably expect. Unfortunately, the same does not apply to the author who wrote the article attacking her. Not that the Daily Caller looks much like a high-quality source to begin with ("conservative HuffPo" doesn't inspire confidence), but the author seems to toe the standard conservative conspiracy lines (Soros, etc.), with an fair amount of misrepresentation in his attack article. If I had some hours I'd look through his articles to see what I could find as far as accuracy, but as it stands, I'm going to go off the headlines and say Snopes probably checked some of his articles, found them wanting, and he took offense. http://dailycaller.com/author/peterhasson/ http://dailycaller.com/author/peterhasson/