3 ms·
So you're saying the law should never, ever change despite that technology changes and improves? That what was good enough for the 1970s is good enough for toda
by morganvachon 10y ago
So you're saying the law should never, ever change despite that technology changes and improves? That what was good enough for the 1970s is good enough for today? Because that's a pound of bullshit that I find hard to swallow.
I still can't understand why you desire zero privacy at the border. Why would any citizen applaud the government for invading their privacy just to entertain security theater? The contents of my phone have zero bearing on whether I'm bringing a gun on a plane. You don't foil a terror plot at the TSA checkpoint by browsing someone's phone contents.
- leereeves 10y agoNo, I'm not saying the law shouldn't change. Advocate changing the law if you want but acknowledge that you're asking for a change in the law. Then consider the reasons the law exists in the first place and why they're no longer applicable, if you think that's the case. And please don't misstate my position. I don't desire having zero privacy. I just recognize why searches are necessary.