> the FCC net neutrality order "imposes intrusive government regulations that won’t work to solve a problem that doesn’t exist using legal authority the FCC doe

> the FCC net neutrality order "imposes intrusive government regulations that won’t work to solve a problem that doesn’t exist using legal authority the FCC doesn’t have." That is an outright lie. Actually, four of them in one sentence! .. Ok, the "intrusive government regulations" part is arguable (at best), but they do work, and they do solve a problem that exists, and, by definition, they do have the authority (these rules clearly give it). > The net neutrality order also required ISPs to make more specific public disclosures about prices, fees, and data caps. What is wrong with that, exactly? Do customers not need to know prices? Is it not literally fraudulent to not give this information?