3 ms·

Um... Need I remind you, that everything from Vault 7, was leaked on flash drives, (vault 7 shit doesn't require infrastructure to deploy or use as most nsa imp

Um... Need I remind you, that everything from Vault 7, was leaked on flash drives, (vault 7 shit doesn't require infrastructure to deploy or use as most nsa implementations do), and given to ex spooks, contractors, ex contractors, private contractors, even those with no intention of working for the government. Basically a deal sweetener, for those with similar status or ideals. Has been showing up in pieces for sale in various places online. I suggest looking into where Assange got his copy of the flash drive from. Pretty interesting. Also, 'the hammer' was purchased by blixtech, who's owner (Edra Blixseth) used it to hack her husband's lawyer during divorce proceedings, upon finding out, he confronted the engineer behind it, who had previously filed 18 formal whistleblower reports with the White House and was denied all 18 times. He has recorded full video testimony and a dozen affidavit's, and received full immunity, finally, two weeks ago. When the story first broke, no judge would pursue it. Eventually Joe arpaio tried to, and Fox recorded extensive reports, which have not yet aired. The engineer provided 800 million recorded phone calls, as many bank records, and emails. The system was just some sort of brute force which broke ssl. This has been mentioned in vault 7, briefly, but will be expanded on in a release very soon. Fox was provided with 10 million sample users, so they could take local callers who were willing to hear their conversations on air to prove this. There is an hour of recordings with Tim Blixseth, Joe Arpaio, and a few others, going over many more details. Definitely worth looking into, however it shouldn't be much longer until it is revealed in full. Pretty insane. Look into it, will blow your mind.

buttsnax 10y ago
I'll add that this isn't normal collection. This was off the books. As in, he was routinely given 5,000$ cash to take to Lockheed facility to give to a contact who would 'sneak' him into use a faster machine.(1 billion attempts per minute.) As well as an sending stuff to the oval offices direct fax line. Everyone believes Trump is saving this as the big reveal, an answer to Obama wiretapping, and as the reason Obama got up, said forget the whole 'build a team to fight trump in DC' thing, got up left his family, and flew to Tahiti (non extradition) for the foreseeable future.(went from month to months to foreseeable future.)
- kbenson 10y ago
  You really, really need to back up assertions like this with sources. Whether it's true or not, it comes across as ranting conspiracy theory without them to anyone that doesn't have the same background information as you. At best you do nothing, the likely case is you get downvoted to oblivion, and the worst case is you actively hurt your cause, as people will have cataloged some of the claims as likely false based on the presentation and source, so future exposure will suffer. Cite your sources. If you think the sources will be discounted by the people you are presenting to, make a case why they should not be, reexamine why you think they are trustworthy, or both.
  - jessaustin 10y ago
    At least one of those assertions is pretty easy to find online: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/324411-obama-vacationing-in-french-polynesia-report http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/324411-obam... I won't even attempt the other stuff.
  - buttsnax 10y ago
    Obviously to understand the scope and scale of the events I tried to use as an example, a vast number of things are required. Im unable to use a computer until tonight and on the run, however, everything I mentioned is all very easy to find online, it's just not on giant websites. Everything I claimed or presented as fact is all findable, and so much contextual information on this and many other events is widely unknown, which is why, if one is interested in seeing the big picture, you need to learn to ignore all the noise. Ignore both sides of all arguments, it's all bs. There's a reason polls are now claiming as high as 70% don't trust the validity of the msm. I'll provide as many sources as I can come up with briefly below. https://m.soundcloud.com/stephenlemons/fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree-part-two https://m.soundcloud.com/stephenlemons/fruit-of-the-poisonou... (part two from same user 20min section is part 1 url misleading) more information can be found out about this recording, but it's going to take some searching. I suggest duckduckgo or similar, nothing is great really, but since the election time, Google removes massive amounts of useful indexing based on who knows what, and ends up being useless half the time when politics and sourcing information is concerned. I don't blame them though, because noone wants anyone to know which people have been caught and which haven't, as obscurity and surprise prove to be huge assets when trying to get people to come forward to testify against superiors. There is a ton of fuckery on both sides here, but it is all unraveling and record pace. Dennis Montgomery is name of whistleblower. Got immunity two weeks ago facilitated by freedom something. Press release by some popular free speech group has more information. Freedom something. Julian Assange provides ton of insight in last couple live interviews as to source of vault 7. And there are about 50 different ex Intel guys who have offered insight into it's source, they are all over the place. Doesn't matter if you are in such heavy denial you refuse to look, but spend enough time and it really is all there, no question or speculation. Sorry, driving, terrible fragmented reply. I'll hook it up fat when I get home. Although all the queries are here to find everything. Avoid Google, use quotes, confirmation bias is fine to locate the information, but seek further context upon locating it.

buttsnax 10y ago

I'll add that this isn't normal collection. This was off the books. As in, he was routinely given 5,000$ cash to take to Lockheed facility to give to a contact who would 'sneak' him into use a faster machine.(1 billion attempts per minute.) As well as an sending stuff to the oval offices direct fax line. Everyone believes Trump is saving this as the big reveal, an answer to Obama wiretapping, and as the reason Obama got up, said forget the whole 'build a team to fight trump in DC' thing, got up left his family, and flew to Tahiti (non extradition) for the foreseeable future.(went from month to months to foreseeable future.)

kbenson 10y ago
You really, really need to back up assertions like this with sources. Whether it's true or not, it comes across as ranting conspiracy theory without them to anyone that doesn't have the same background information as you. At best you do nothing, the likely case is you get downvoted to oblivion, and the worst case is you actively hurt your cause, as people will have cataloged some of the claims as likely false based on the presentation and source, so future exposure will suffer. Cite your sources. If you think the sources will be discounted by the people you are presenting to, make a case why they should not be, reexamine why you think they are trustworthy, or both.
- jessaustin 10y ago
  At least one of those assertions is pretty easy to find online: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/324411-obama-vacationing-in-french-polynesia-report http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/324411-obam... I won't even attempt the other stuff.
- buttsnax 10y ago
  Obviously to understand the scope and scale of the events I tried to use as an example, a vast number of things are required. Im unable to use a computer until tonight and on the run, however, everything I mentioned is all very easy to find online, it's just not on giant websites. Everything I claimed or presented as fact is all findable, and so much contextual information on this and many other events is widely unknown, which is why, if one is interested in seeing the big picture, you need to learn to ignore all the noise. Ignore both sides of all arguments, it's all bs. There's a reason polls are now claiming as high as 70% don't trust the validity of the msm. I'll provide as many sources as I can come up with briefly below. https://m.soundcloud.com/stephenlemons/fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree-part-two https://m.soundcloud.com/stephenlemons/fruit-of-the-poisonou... (part two from same user 20min section is part 1 url misleading) more information can be found out about this recording, but it's going to take some searching. I suggest duckduckgo or similar, nothing is great really, but since the election time, Google removes massive amounts of useful indexing based on who knows what, and ends up being useless half the time when politics and sourcing information is concerned. I don't blame them though, because noone wants anyone to know which people have been caught and which haven't, as obscurity and surprise prove to be huge assets when trying to get people to come forward to testify against superiors. There is a ton of fuckery on both sides here, but it is all unraveling and record pace. Dennis Montgomery is name of whistleblower. Got immunity two weeks ago facilitated by freedom something. Press release by some popular free speech group has more information. Freedom something. Julian Assange provides ton of insight in last couple live interviews as to source of vault 7. And there are about 50 different ex Intel guys who have offered insight into it's source, they are all over the place. Doesn't matter if you are in such heavy denial you refuse to look, but spend enough time and it really is all there, no question or speculation. Sorry, driving, terrible fragmented reply. I'll hook it up fat when I get home. Although all the queries are here to find everything. Avoid Google, use quotes, confirmation bias is fine to locate the information, but seek further context upon locating it.