Thank you for the link. > Most significant, he [Obama] failed to acknowledge something known to the US intelligence community: that the Syrian army is not the

Thank you for the link. > Most significant, he [Obama] failed to acknowledge something known to the US intelligence community: that the Syrian army is not the only party in the country’s civil war with access to sarin, the nerve agent that a UN study concluded – without assessing responsibility – had been used in the rocket attack. > When the attack occurred al-Nusra should have been a suspect, but the administration cherry-picked intelligence to justify a strike against Assad. I think many of us are asking the same thing: Is the intelligence we're being fed cherry picked. It's unsettling that the government and the media does not have to be accountable to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, which is what the general public expects. What happens to those people who mislead us, and are we finally going to smarten up?