Aurelia beats them all by the aggregated, somewhat obscure "Code Quality" metric but is beaten by all of them in every other way. Except Ember, of course: https

Aurelia beats them all by the aggregated, somewhat obscure "Code Quality" metric but is beaten by all of them in every other way. Except Ember, of course: https://js.libhunt.com/project/ember-js/vs/aurelia https://js.libhunt.com/project/ember-js/vs/aurelia No matter how accurate the metric is, a framework/library's value lies not in how perfect its code is. Nobody actually uses Aurelia (yes, that's hyperbole but even Ember beats Aurelia in every popularity metric except Downloads). You can't simply define Aurelia into relevance, even if LibHunt backs it up. Also, who even uses LibHunt?