> People aren't proposing privacy extensions, it's a finished standard that's been enabled by default in most major operating systems for many years now. Appar

> People aren't proposing privacy extensions, it's a finished standard that's been enabled by default in most major operating systems for many years now. Apparently [1] it's not that simple, and apparently [2] stuff came after that standard in as late as 2014 (and I can't really say I've been keeping up with IPv6 news enough in the past 3 years to know how things look different right now compared to 2014). I also see a related Defcon article from 2015 [3] which claims "IPv6 is bad for your privacy" though I haven't read it yet. [1] http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2015/02/ipv6-security-myth-5-privacy-addresses-fix-everything/ http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2015/02/ipv6-s... [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7217 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7217 [3] https://www.defcon.org/images/defcon-15/dc15-presentations/Lindqvist/Whitepaper/dc-15-lindqvist-WP.pdf https://www.defcon.org/images/defcon-15/dc15-presentations/L...