4 ms·
>There would be no hard evidence linking the source of the attack. There would be no hard evidence of a submarine launched ICBM pre-impact in the year 2017? I
by mustacheemperor 10y ago
>There would be no hard evidence linking the source of the attack.
There would be no hard evidence of a submarine launched ICBM pre-impact in the year 2017? I think you can stay up a while longer.
- czep 10y agoIn the age of fake news, denial and misdirection would work in Putin's favor. All he needs to say is let's send a team to conduct an “impartial, objective, honest investigation.” Meanwhile, the US collapses. I mean sure we can say we have hard evidence that the warhead was launched from a Russian sub, but RT will report things differently and half the world won't believe anything the US says anyway. Honestly this is a serious risk and the only thing we can do is elect a batshit crazy leader who can convince Putin he's stupid enough to push the button. Oh I see...