3 ms·
Strictly speaking, that's them exercising their property rights, not their free speech rights.
by duncan_bayne 10y ago
Strictly speaking, that's them exercising their property rights, not their free speech rights.
- dpark 10y agoI'd say it's both.
- duncan_bayne 10y agoWell yes - they're free to tell them to leave (speech), and free to compel them (property). Interestingly some theorists consider freedom of speech a special case of property rights.
- dpark 10y agoIn the case of a platform like Twitter, blocking certain types of speech is also a meaningful expression in itself. Telling someone to leave is a form of speech in itself. But telling (for example) many environmentalists to leave would also express a view on environmentalism because of the effect it would have on the overall conversion. Shaping the discourse on the platform is similar to a media outlet shaping the discourse it drives with selective reporting.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]