It's not correct to call this a VM. It's an optimized template language/renderer. I'd like to see an example of the same static gzipped HTML content delivered

It's not correct to call this a VM. It's an optimized template language/renderer. I'd like to see an example of the same static gzipped HTML content delivered to the browser and a template rendered with this. I have doubts this is any more efficient than the browser's built-in gzip decoder on a time basis nor do I think it beats gzip in terms of space efficiency. It's hard to take seriously those who claim to be optimizing things when they don't have any measurements on what they are trying to improve vs. the new method.