3 ms·
> What else would he say since he still owns a ton of stock even after the sale? On the other hand, why else would someone sell 30% of their stock? It's not u
by chimeracoder 10y ago
> What else would he say since he still owns a ton of stock even after the sale?
On the other hand, why else would someone sell 30% of their stock? It's not unusual for someone to announce a plan for complete divestment (usually over the course of several years, to avoid disrupting the market) - that's what Gates is doing with Microsoft, in fact.
If he's holding on to 70% of his stock, it's not like he thinks Twitter is doomed. And as such a large shareholder and board member, it's not like he's just pretending in bad faith to sell only 30% now, but secretly planning on announcing that he's selling the remainder in another year or two. That would be very illegal, and the SEC would come down on him hard.
- poikniok 10y agoHow exactly would that work? He would just say in a year or two that he decided out of the blue to sell the remainder, and how are you going to prove otherwise?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- dexterdog 10y agoHow and why would that be illegal? He owns the stock. At a certain price it is worth keeping and as the price goes up he has the right to take some off of the table just list as the stock tanks he has the right to secure some of his wealth, especially since he has another company that seems to be his real focus.