3 ms·
I respect his personal reasons but the stock is public and he is in charge. I couldn't care if he liquidates 99% of what he has -- what would put me to ease as
by joering2 10y ago
I respect his personal reasons but the stock is public and he is in charge.
I couldn't care if he liquidates 99% of what he has -- what would put me to ease as a shareholder is what is that "personal" reason. Buy a house? New startup? Fight a cancer. Sure, I'm fine... but if that personal reason turns out to be no reason at all, then its a short sign!
- notatoad 10y ago>and he is in charge @ev runs Medium now, i don't think he's involved in the day-to-day of twitter at all anymore. He's certainly not in charge.
- dualogy 10y ago> what would put me to ease as a shareholder is what is that "personal" reason That's easy. A "personal reason" is one that's none of anyone's business ;)
- chimeracoder 10y ago> I couldn't care if he liquidates 99% of what he has -- what would put me to ease as a shareholder is what is that "personal" reason. Buy a house? New startup? Fight a cancer. Sure, I'm fine... but if that personal reason turns out to be no reason at all, then its a short sign! Did you read the article? He very clearly says: > Here’s the short story: I like to invest a lot in things I care about. For example, I’m the largest LP at Obvious Ventures, which has invested in over 35 world-positive companies. In addition, my wife and I have done a fair amount of philanthropic giving and—especially in the last year—upped our political donations significantly . These are all efforts to help build a smarter, more sustainable world. I’ve been doing all of them for a while, and I’d like to continue. (In the early days, I also funded Medium, but have not in recent years and don’t have any plans to, thanks to awesome investor/partners.)