3 ms·
Of course it's marketing. The website is obviously not a legally binding contract. The point is that it's not in any way described as being an fixed percentag
by Consultant32452 10y ago
Of course it's marketing. The website is obviously not a legally binding contract. The point is that it's not in any way described as being an fixed percentage of what the passenger pays. That's just not the payment mechanism at all. Of course, the devil is in the details, but it would really surprise me if Uber's contract had a completely different compensation model than the website.
- lovich 10y agoThe company that routinely breaks laws as their business model? It would surprise you if they broke another law?
- Consultant32452 10y agoNo, it wouldn't surprise me that they broke the law. I'm still going to request some actual evidence though.