3 ms·

Thanks alnayyir - I will gladly take the constructive criticism. I am looking for someone with talent and experience and I will pay up for it - I'd rather not

Thanks alnayyir - I will gladly take the constructive criticism. I am looking for someone with talent and experience and I will pay up for it - I'd rather not put a specific $ amount on it. If someone is going to get put off by the choices of the words execute or engage then we are probably not a good match. I am looking for a serious developer with experience in the category of video chat who finds the idea of spending several weeks on a project and getting paid well for it appealing. I will reiterate that I would love to find a cofounder or someone who may be interested in having on-going involvement in the Company. Thanks again.

alnayyir 16y ago
I'm not speaking to you as someone interested in your idea, I'm here to help someone is clearly unfamiliar with how this community tends to communicate and interact. Also, you failed to directly reply to comment, breaking the thread. Click reply on the comment you wish to reply to, not the thread. I don't think you grasp my greater point. It's not about your words not making 'us' a match, it's that they are poorly chosen for this whole community. Another thing to point out, "involvement in the Company." There is no company, there is no product, there is no revenue. Don't talk about fictions of your mind. People are regularly reminded here not to obsess over titles and fictions of thought. Also, the capitalization makes this borderline grotesque.
- rockfile4 16y ago
  Anayyir - While my style may not appeal to you, I've already received a few thoughtful emails in response to my post. The HN community may have a broader perspective then you give it credit for. Thanks again for your suggestion on DSP forums - I have already found one that looks like it will be a great resource.
  - alnayyir 16y ago
    >While my style may not appeal to you, I've already received a few thoughtful emails in response to my post. I understand you're trying to take a measured tone here but it isn't sating me. Please don't take such a shotgun approach in attempting to recruit people for your ideas in future. And no, the fact that a couple people emailed you doesn't change the content of what I'm saying. I'll let the karma judge whether or not the community wants this place to get run down with posts like this, which have already become far too frequent.

alnayyir 16y ago

I'm not speaking to you as someone interested in your idea, I'm here to help someone is clearly unfamiliar with how this community tends to communicate and interact. Also, you failed to directly reply to comment, breaking the thread. Click reply on the comment you wish to reply to, not the thread. I don't think you grasp my greater point. It's not about your words not making 'us' a match, it's that they are poorly chosen for this whole community. Another thing to point out, "involvement in the Company." There is no company, there is no product, there is no revenue. Don't talk about fictions of your mind. People are regularly reminded here not to obsess over titles and fictions of thought. Also, the capitalization makes this borderline grotesque.

rockfile4 16y ago
Anayyir - While my style may not appeal to you, I've already received a few thoughtful emails in response to my post. The HN community may have a broader perspective then you give it credit for. Thanks again for your suggestion on DSP forums - I have already found one that looks like it will be a great resource.
- alnayyir 16y ago
  >While my style may not appeal to you, I've already received a few thoughtful emails in response to my post. I understand you're trying to take a measured tone here but it isn't sating me. Please don't take such a shotgun approach in attempting to recruit people for your ideas in future. And no, the fact that a couple people emailed you doesn't change the content of what I'm saying. I'll let the karma judge whether or not the community wants this place to get run down with posts like this, which have already become far too frequent.